How Our Immune System Really Works — And Why Most of Medicine Misses the Mark

At the height of COVID, I sent an email to our local hospital.

I offered our clinic, including our staff, our IV infrastructure, and our oxygen capacity to help triage patients. I proposed something radical at the time: intervene before people crashed. Pilot protocols using high-dose IV vitamin C, correct vitamin D deficiency, support antioxidant systems with glutathione, and address immune dysfunction upstream of respiratory failure.

The response?

Nothing.

No acknowledgement.

No discussion.

Just silence.

That moment crystallized something I had known for years but had never seen so starkly exposed: modern medicine is extraordinarily good at rescue, and remarkably poor at immune preparedness.

Five years later, we’re still having the wrong conversation, even as mainstream media finally begins to ask better questions.

A recent BBC Science Focus cover story framed the issue plainly: the immune system is not a static shield, but a living, adaptive network that must be supported before it is overwhelmed²⁸. At the same time, Canadian headlines warn of emerging “super-flu” variants and viral mutations that may outpace last year’s immunity²⁹.

These articles are not alarmist — they are overdue. They highlight a reality clinicians have long understood: viral threats evolve, but immune resilience is built or lost, long before exposure.

Viruses Evolve. Our Strategy Barely Has.

Each winter brings new headlines: novel flu variants, immune escape, strain mismatch. Viral mutation is expected in biological systems. What is far more concerning is how little our strategy evolves in response.

The default medical approach remains:

• wait for symptoms,

• suppress fever,

• manage discomfort,

• escalate to oxygen when deterioration occurs.

Vaccines and antivirals have a role. But neither replaces the need for immune system integrity; the body's capacity to recognize pathogens, respond appropriately, regulate inflammation, and recover efficiently.

The recent BBC Science Focus article underscores this point: immune function is shaped daily by sleep, stress, nutrition, circadian rhythms, gut health, and metabolic state—not activated on demand once illness strikes²⁸. Yet most medical systems remain organized around crisis response rather than immune cultivation.

Immunology and nutrition research make this clear: the immune system is not a static shield, but a dynamic, adaptive network shaped by sleep, stress, nutrition, circadian rhythm, metabolic state, and micronutrient sufficiency¹˒². When these inputs are ignored, immune performance degrades, regardless of downstream medical interventions.

Why Conventional Medicine Struggles with Viruses

This is not a criticism of individual physicians. It is a systems problem.

Conventional medicine excels at trauma, bacterial infection, surgery, and end-stage disease management. Viruses are different.

There is no equivalent of a broad-spectrum antibiotic for viral illness. Most antivirals are modestly effective, highly time-dependent, and strain-specific. Once viral replication peaks and inflammation dominates, medical care becomes largely supportive.

In other words: by the time patients are “sick enough,” the most meaningful window has often closed.

Immune resilience must be built before exposure and supported at the earliest onset — not outsourced entirely to emergency care.

The Immune System Lives in the Gut

Approximately 70% of immune tissue resides in the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT)¹¹. This is foundational immunology. The gut is where immune tolerance is learned, inflammatory responses are calibrated, and microbial signals shape antiviral readiness. Importantly, the gut also tightly regulates nutrient absorption through saturable transporters and metabolic checkpoints.

This matters because many immune-critical nutrients, including vitamin C, zinc, magnesium, and glutathione precursors, cannot reach pharmacologically meaningful serum levels through oral intake alone.

Disruption of gut integrity through poor diet, chronic stress, alcohol, medications, or recurrent infections is associated with impaired immune regulation and increased susceptibility to illness¹¹˒¹³.

Clinically, this often presents as:

• recurrent infections,

• prolonged viral courses,

• exaggerated inflammatory responses.

Why IV and IM Nutrient Therapy Is Fundamentally Different

Intravenous (IV) and intramuscular (IM) nutrient delivery bypasses intestinal regulation entirely, allowing clinicians to raise serum and intracellular nutrient levels to ranges not achievable through oral supplementation³–⁶.

High-Dose IV Vitamin C

Vitamin C is the clearest example.

Oral vitamin C absorption is saturable, with plasma concentrations tightly regulated and plateauing well below levels shown to influence oxidative stress, endothelial function, immune signaling, and viral defense³. In contrast, high-dose IV vitamin C achieves pharmacologic plasma concentrations capable of modulating inflammation, supporting immune cell function, and influencing redox balance³–⁶.

This distinction is not semantic; it is a simple biochemical reality.

Glutathione and Redox Support

Glutathione, the body’s master antioxidant, plays a central role in immune resilience, detoxification, and recovery from viral illness. Oral glutathione has poor bioavailability, whereas IV administration directly supports intracellular redox systems and oxidative stress regulation⁶.

Clinic-Specific Immune Formulas

At our clinic, immune-focused IV formulas such as High-Dose IV Vitamin C, Shield, and Flu Fighter are designed to support immune integrity through:

• hydration with physiologic osmolarity,

• antioxidant support,

• mineral cofactors,

• and targeted vitamins delivered at clinically meaningful concentrations.

These are not “immune boosts.” They are delivery systems designed to work within immune physiology.

IM Vitamin D

Vitamin D deficiency is widespread and consistently associated with impaired immune regulation and increased susceptibility to respiratory infections⁷˒⁸. Intramuscular vitamin D allows for rapid repletion in individuals with malabsorption, non-adherence, or acute immune stress, providing another tool when oral therapy is insufficient.

Botanical Medicines: A Vast Pharmacopoeia, Not a Footnote

One of the quiet failures of modern medicine is how thoroughly it has sidelined botanical therapeutics; not because they lack biological activity, but because they resist simplification.

There are hundreds of plant medicines with documented antiviral, antimicrobial, and immunomodulatory properties, many used safely for centuries and increasingly supported by modern pharmacology²¹–²⁷.

This includes, but is by no means limited to:

• Echinacea species (immune signaling, macrophage and NK-cell activation)²¹

• Zingiber officinale (ginger; antiviral and anti-inflammatory effects)²²

• Ocimum sanctum (holy basil; immunomodulatory and stress-adaptive effects)²³

• Artemisia species (broad antimicrobial and antiviral activity)²⁴

• Hydrastis canadensis (goldenseal; antimicrobial and mucosal support)²⁵

• Sambucus nigra (elderberry; viral entry inhibition)²⁶

• Astragalus membranaceus (immune tonification and antiviral signaling)²⁷

• Glycyrrhiza glabra (licorice; antiviral and mucosal protection)¹⁶˒¹⁷

Botanical medicines do not simply “kill” viruses. They influence viral replication, host-cell entry, interferon signaling, inflammatory cascades, and tissue resilience. They act on the biological terrain, not just the pathogen.

A Representative Example: Andrographis paniculata

Within this vast pharmacopeia, Andrographis paniculata is often highlighted, not because it is unique, but because it is well-studied, well-tolerated, and mechanistically illustrative.

Randomized trials and systematic reviews demonstrate that when used early in viral upper respiratory infections, andrographis reduces symptom severity and shortens illness duration¹⁴˒¹⁵. Mechanistically, it modulates cytokine signaling, inhibits viral replication, and supports interferon-mediated antiviral defenses¹⁴˒¹⁵.

It serves as a case study, not a limitation.

Fasting, Fever, and Forgotten Physiology

Loss of appetite during acute illness is not pathological — it is adaptive.

Experimental data show that short-term fasting during early viral infection shifts immune metabolism toward antiviral pathways and reduces inflammatory burden¹⁸. This reflects strategic metabolic restraint, paired with hydration and electrolytes.

Similarly, fever is not an error.

Elevation of core body temperature inhibits viral replication, enhances immune-cell trafficking, and improves interferon signaling¹⁹. Unless extreme or dangerous, aggressive fever suppression may prolong illness and blunt immune learning²⁰.

The immune system knows what it is doing. We frequently interfere when we should be supporting.

A Note on Safety and Clinical Use

IV nutrients, IM injections, and botanical medicines are biologically active interventions and should be used with the same respect as pharmaceuticals.

Certain therapies may be contraindicated or require caution in pregnancy or breastfeeding, autoimmune disease, cardiovascular disease (e.g., licorice), renal impairment, or concurrent prescription medication use.

For this reason, immune-focused therapies should be individualized, time-limited, and clinician-guided, particularly in medically complex patients.

The Conversation We’re Committed to Leading

The lesson of COVID was not that we lacked technology. It was that we lacked immune literacy. As viral threats continue to evolve, i.e., influenza, RSV, COVID, and beyond, the answer is not fear, nor is it passive waiting. The answer is building immune integrity long before the headline hits. That has been our philosophy for years. It will define our work in 2026 and beyond.

Because the best time to support your immune system is before you need it to save you.

References

1. Calder PC. BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2020;3:74-92.

2. Childs CE, et al. Nutrients. 2019;11:1933.

3. Carr AC, Maggini S. Nutrients. 2017;9:1211.

4. Hemilä H, Chalker E. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;CD000980.

5. Fowler AA, et al. J Transl Med. 2017;15:91.

6. Marik PE, et al. Chest. 2017;151:1229-1238.

7. Grant WB, et al. Nutrients. 2020;12:988.

8. Martineau AR, et al. BMJ. 2017;356:i6583.

9. Gombart AF, et al. Nutrients. 2020;12:236.

10. Wessels I, et al. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1712.

11. Belkaid Y, Hand TW. Cell. 2014;157:121-141.

12. Hao Q, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;CD006895.

13. Liu Y, et al. Gut. 2016;65:1070-1072.

14. Hu XY, et al. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0181780.

15. Coon JT, Ernst E. Planta Med. 2004;70:293-298.

16. Fiore C, et al. Phytother Res. 2008;22:141-148.

17. Cinatl J, et al. Lancet. 2003;361:2045-2046.

18. Wang A, et al. Cell. 2016;166:1512-1525.

19. Evans SS, et al. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15:335-349.

20. Mackowiak PA. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:1037-1040.

21. Hudson JB. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:769896.

22. Mao QQ, et al. Foods. 2019;8:185.

23. Cohen MM. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2014;5:251-259.

24. Efferth T. Planta Med. 2017;83:89-99.

25. Tillhon M, et al. Biochem Pharmacol. 2012;84:1260-1267.

26. Hawkins J, et al. Nutrients. 2019;11:1806.

27. Auyeung KK, et al. Am J Chin Med. 2016;44:1-22.

28.  BBC Science Focus. Protect Yourself Before You Wreck Yourself: How to Build a Resilient Immune System. BBC Science Focus Magazine. 2024.

29.  National Post. Is the “super flu” as bad as it sounds? What to know about the mutated variant spreading in Canada. National Post. 2024.